More Pratchett!!
Am in awe of Terry Pratchett. It's been years since I've been hooked to any author the way am hooked to Pratchett right now. In my opinion he is up there with Wodehouse, Asimov, Arthur C Clarke and Douglas Adams. I remember spending entire summers reading Asimov and Wodehouse.
I think I picked up Colour of Magic (the first Discworld book) sometime in July. It's mid september now. Wow almost 3 months! And I still want to read more of his stuff. Only thing I read in between was Nick Mason's "Inside Out" (more on that soon). 12 books in a row... and nowhere close to bored or too much of the same thing.
I remember wanting to write a blog entry last year about Tolkien and Lord Of The Rings... but then I thought "nah i'll probably say what thousands before me have said, that the man had an unparalleled imagination and that he is the father of the modern fantasy genre".... I did land up reading Hobbit and Silmarillion after LOTR but then you have to I guess.. that is if you want to know more about Middle Earth and it's past. With Pratchett it's not quite the same. After one book you can probably take it or leave it. There is continuity but most books can be enjoyed on their own. Although I would recommend following this reading order guide:
Reading Order List
Or the order in which they were published:
Publication Order List
I guess I want more of his stuff cos he is very entertaining. Like I've said before he reminds me of Douglas Adams. He makes references to other books, movies, popular culture, etc which can be quite hit or miss. The other day I came across "The Annotated Prattchet File". It's a collection of references he has made in his books over the years. My first reaction was "HOLY SHIT! This guy is very well read and knows a lot!!!". From references to various mythologies, to Shakespeare, to Monty Python to Led Zeppelin... it's very very diverse. But then again I shouldn't be surprised since Pratchett parodies anything and everything.
Dad pointed out the other day that his stuff would make more sense if we knew what exactly he was parodying. True but I think it's impossible to have read and seen everything he refers to (not if you have a steady job and a life anyway!). And even without knowing all his references and allusions the books make pretty good reading on their own.
Although I've stressed on the humour in his books, they have a philosophical angle as well which you'll can figure out when you read the books. Mark Knopfler's Ragpicker's Dream awaits.